Sanctions Updates
Prime Minister Cameron challenges Barclays on Iran transactions
Prime Minister David Cameron has challenged Barclays for declining to process payments from Iran after they ceased to be prohibited in the EU following sanctions relief. He has written to Barclays stating that it was acting “in opposition to the policy of the UK government”. Barclays replied that there was “a considerable divergence in both approach and intention between the EU…and the US, where primary sanctions remain in place”, and that “as we offer banking services through our US operations we are required to continue to restrict business activity with Iran”.
In January, Chief Executive of the British Bankers’ Association Anthony Browne said that “International banks are likely to need considerably more clarity from US authorities… before engaging with Iran”, reflecting what is said to be the position of many UK banks – that they still face substantial compliance risks while most US sanctions on the country remain in force.
Asset freeze on Vice PM of Ukraine lifted
HM Treasury has published a notice confirming that an EU asset freeze against Raisa Bohatyriova, politician and former Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, has been lifted, following the publication of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/311. The Regulation and related Decision extended asset freezes by 1 year against 16 people listed for allegedly misappropriating Ukrainian state funds, and de-listed Ms Bohatyriova after she was said to have repaid the funds she was accused of misappropriating.US export restrictions on Chinese ZTE
The United States has imposed export restrictions on Chinese smartphone manufacturer ZTE, prohibiting US companies from selling to it without a specific licence, and foreign companies from selling products to it which contain a significant % of US-made components. The US Commerce Department issued a statement saying this was in response to ZTE breaching US sanctions by illicitly re-exporting controlled items to sanctioned countries, and organising a series of shell companies for this purpose in relation to Iran. 3 such shell companies have also been designated.
The Commerce Department has said that
applications for export licences to ship to ZTE will generally be
denied, though ZTE is not prohibited from continuing to sell its
products in the US.
Updates to OFAC's Kingpin, Zimbabwe & Sudan lists
OFAC has designated Tanzanian national
Ali Hassan and the Hassan Drug Trafficking Organization as Specially
Designated Narcotics Trafficking Kingpins. Mr Hassan is said to have
used his organisation to smuggle multi-ton shipments of heroin and
cocaine to Africa, Europe, Asia, and North America and bribed African
government officials in order to avoid arrest and prosecution. The US
Treasury’s press release is here.
In addition, OFAC has designated Chemplex
Corporation, linked to designated Industrial Development Corporation of
Zimbabwe, and Zimbabwe Fertiliser Company under its Zimbabwe sanctions,
and de-listed Atbara Cement Company from its Sudan sanctions.
Yates memo applies to sanctions cases
In September 2015, the Yates memo,
written by US Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, identified 6 key
steps to be taken, or already being taken, by the US Department of
Justice with the intention of enhancing its efforts to identify and
prosecute culpable individuals, at all levels, in corporate fraud and
misconduct cases.
Now, David Laufman, chief of
counterintelligence and export control at the National Security Division
of the DoJ, has stated that the Yates memo will also “govern
investigations and prosecutions of violations of US export control and
sanctions laws by corporations and corporate officers employed by those
corporations”. Where corporate parties are involved, a decision on
whether to prosecute will now take account of new factors, such as
whether possible violations were disclosed voluntarily and, if so, how
quickly. In particular, the focus of the Yates memo was on prosecuting
culpable individuals within corporations.
The DoJ is preparing guidance that sets
out the benefits available to companies that voluntarily disclose a
violation, with the maximum benefit available where there is also full
cooperation and meaningful communication, as well as the kind of
behaviour that would count against them. The benefits may include
non-prosecution or deferred prosecution agreements, reduced fines, and
shortened periods of supervised compliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your post will be responded to within 24 hours